Home About the NaturalNews Network | Contact Us | Write for Us

U.S. Agriculture Department lacks realistic bird flu detection plan, says inspector general

Wednesday, June 21, 2006 by: NaturalNews, citizen journalist
Key concepts: Bird flu, United States and Natural health

Follow CounterThink on Twitter

Bookmark and Share   Email this article to a friend Printable Version  FREE Email Newsletter

Articles Related to This Article:

Why the bird flu virus is less deadly but more dangerous

President Bush's bird flu plan fails to teach people how to really protect themselves from a global pandemic

Interview with David Wolfe on raw foods, the bird flu and herbal healing

FREE Health Freedom Newsletter

Daily reporting on health freedom, vaccines, natural cures and more - by the editor of CounterThink.com. Join over 1.2 million monthly readers.



Unsubscribe anytime, email privacy guaranteed

(NaturalNews) During an audit conducted yesterday by the Agriculture Department's inspector general's office, reports emerged indicating the agency does not have an ample plan for detecting bird flu in poultry and wild birds.

As it stands, the Agriculture Department relies heavily on state agriculture department reports and voluntary testing by the poultry industry. Despite this, agency spokeswoman Hallie Pickhardt said the agency had no immediate plans to impose mandatory testing upon the poultry industry, but that they agree "with everything in the [audit] report, and we're either doing it or going to be doing it."

According to Pickhardt, the Agriculture Department will begin to follow up on voluntary testing with their own checks, while the audit further suggested testing live-bird markets and illegal fighting-gamecock auctions.

The industry trade group known as the National Chicken Council, whose members produce more than 90 percent of the chicken in the United States, said in January that it would begin testing all flocks for bird flu two weeks before they are slaughtered. Stephen Pretanic, the National Chicken Council's science director, said that the industry had modeled its testing practices on the Agriculture Department's proposals, so he expected a "seamless transition" when the department publishes their regulations.

Although poultry experts claim that an infection would be apparent long before it was found through testing, and a single case of bird flu has yet to be reported in the United States, tensions are running high over an impending U.S. outbreak. A goose in Canada raised concerns after testing positive for the H5 strain of the virus, but veterinary officials said yesterday that they could not find enough virus in the bird to confirm N1; the deadly form of bird flu known to have caused human fatalities.

###

Permission is granted to reprint this article in its entirety provided the source (NaturalNews) is clearly cited and a clickable link is provided to http://www.CounterThink.com/019438.html


Get articles like this delivered to you FREE in our popular email newsletter

Related CounterThink Cartoons:


Related Articles:

Why the bird flu virus is less deadly but more dangerous

President Bush's bird flu plan fails to teach people how to really protect themselves from a global pandemic

Interview with David Wolfe on raw foods, the bird flu and herbal healing

Take Action: Support CounterThink.com

Email this article to a friend

Share this article on: NewsVine | digg | del.icio.us

Permalink to this article: http://www.CounterThink.com/019438.html

Reprinting this article: Non-commercial OK, cite CounterThink.com with clickable link.

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):


Free Special Reports

How to Build Your Financial Safety Net
The 7 Principles of Mindful Wealth
The Healing Power of Sunlight and Vitamin D
The pH Nutrition Guide to Acid / Alkaline Balance
Pet Food Ingredients Revealed! (shocking)
Medicine From Fish
The Water Cure

Also on CounterThink:

Streaming Health Ranger Videos
CounterThink Cartoons
FREE Special Reports
Podcasts


This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2008 All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.